↓ Skip to main content

Cross-Cultural Differences and Similarities in Human Value Instantiation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross-Cultural Differences and Similarities in Human Value Instantiation
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00849
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul H. P. Hanel, Gregory R. Maio, Ana K. S. Soares, Katia C. Vione, Gabriel L. de Holanda Coelho, Valdiney V. Gouveia, Appasaheb C. Patil, Shanmukh V. Kamble, Antony S. R. Manstead

Abstract

Previous research found that the within-country variability of human values (e.g., equality and helpfulness) clearly outweighs between-country variability. Across three countries (Brazil, India, and the United Kingdom), the present research tested in student samples whether between-nation differences reside more in the behaviors used to concretely instantiate (i.e., exemplify or understand) values than in their importance as abstract ideals. In Study 1 (N = 630), we found several meaningful between-country differences in the behaviors that were used to concretely instantiate values, alongside high within-country variability. In Study 2 (N = 677), we found that participants were able to match instantiations back to the values from which they were derived, even if the behavior instantiations were spontaneously produced only by participants from another country or were created by us. Together, these results support the hypothesis that people in different nations can differ in the behaviors that are seen as typical as instantiations of values, while holding similar ideas about the abstract meaning of the values and their importance.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Unspecified 11 6%
Researcher 10 5%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 46 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 24%
Social Sciences 19 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 8%
Unspecified 10 5%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 52 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,331,280
of 23,664,476 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,730
of 31,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,506
of 332,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#85
of 646 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,664,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 646 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.