You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The simultaneous effect of NAO and SO on the monsoon activity over India
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, November 2000
|
DOI | 10.1029/1999gl011201 |
Authors |
S. B. Kakade, S. S. Dugam |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 24% |
Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 35% |
Engineering | 4 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,988,033
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#3,838
of 19,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,542
of 39,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#5
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.