↓ Skip to main content

PSMA-PET based radiotherapy: a review of initial experiences, survey on current practice and future perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PSMA-PET based radiotherapy: a review of initial experiences, survey on current practice and future perspectives
Published in
Radiation Oncology, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13014-018-1047-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Zschaeck, Fabian Lohaus, Marcus Beck, Gregor Habl, Stephanie Kroeze, Constantinos Zamboglou, Stefan Alexander Koerber, Jürgen Debus, Tobias Hölscher, Peter Wust, Ute Ganswindt, Alexander D. J. Baur, Klaus Zöphel, Nikola Cihoric, Matthias Guckenberger, Stephanie E. Combs, Anca Ligia Grosu, Pirus Ghadjar, Claus Belka

Abstract

68Gallium prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography (PET) is an increasingly used imaging modality in prostate cancer, especially in cases of tumor recurrence after curative intended therapy. Owed to the novelty of the PSMA-targeting tracers, clinical evidence on the value of PSMA-PET is moderate but rapidly increasing. State of the art imaging is pivotal for radiotherapy treatment planning as it may affect dose prescription, target delineation and use of concomitant therapy.This review summarizes the evidence on PSMA-PET imaging from a radiation oncologist's point of view. Additionally a short survey containing twelve examples of patients and 6 additional questions was performed in seven mayor academic centers with experience in PSMA ligand imaging and the findings are reported here.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 18%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Other 8 18%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Other 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 60%
Unspecified 10 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,118,274
of 12,991,172 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#119
of 1,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,743
of 269,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,991,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them