↓ Skip to main content

Ice thickness measurements in Lake Erie during the winter of 2010–2011

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Great Lakes Research, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Ice thickness measurements in Lake Erie during the winter of 2010–2011
Published in
Journal of Great Lakes Research, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jglr.2018.04.004
Authors

Nathan Hawley, Dmitry Beletsky, Jia Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,095,537
of 12,489,036 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#214
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,923
of 270,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#17
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,489,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.