↓ Skip to main content

Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Game Theory, December 1973
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
446 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points
Published in
International Journal of Game Theory, December 1973
DOI 10.1007/bf01737554
Authors

John C. Harsanyi

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 6%
Germany 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 92 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 35%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 10 10%
Professor 9 9%
Unspecified 9 9%
Other 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 38 37%
Unspecified 16 15%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Engineering 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 23 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,413,709
of 12,229,988 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Game Theory
#2
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,085
of 233,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Game Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,229,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them