You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-utility of a walking programme for moderately depressed, obese, or overweight elderly women in primary care: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-8-231 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Narcis Gusi, Maria C Reyes, Jose L Gonzalez-Guerrero, Emilio Herrera, Jose M Garcia |
| Abstract |
There is a considerable public health burden due to physical inactivity, because it is a major independent risk factor for several diseases (e.g., type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, moderate mood disorders neurotic diseases such as depression, etc.). This study assesses the cost utility of the adding a supervised walking programme to the standard "best primary care" for overweight, moderately obese, or moderately depressed elderly women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 307 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 19% |
| Researcher | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 21% |
| Unknown | 53 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 14% |
| Psychology | 33 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 30 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 14% |
| Unknown | 78 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,935,591
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,335
of 14,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,464
of 81,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.