You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the new rural cooperative medical system in China: is it working or not?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-7-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hassan H Dib, Xilong Pan, Hong Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,152
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,548
of 81,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.