↓ Skip to main content

Neural best-buddies

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
48 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural best-buddies
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, August 2018
DOI 10.1145/3197517.3201332
Authors

Kfir Aberman, Jing Liao, Mingyi Shi, Dani Lischinski, Baoquan Chen, Daniel Cohen-Or

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Student > Master 30 20%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Other 8 5%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 98 64%
Engineering 15 10%
Mathematics 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 31 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#835,005
of 15,359,213 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#56
of 1,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,111
of 278,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,359,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them