↓ Skip to main content

Neural best-buddies

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural best-buddies
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, August 2018
DOI 10.1145/3197517.3201332
Authors

Kfir Aberman, Jing Liao, Mingyi Shi, Dani Lischinski, Baoquan Chen, Daniel Cohen-Or

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Other 6 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 89 64%
Engineering 14 10%
Mathematics 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 27 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#859,351
of 16,699,900 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#56
of 2,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,412
of 283,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,699,900 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them