↓ Skip to main content

Engaging with Community Advisory Boards (CABs) in Lusaka Zambia: perspectives from the research team and CAB members

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engaging with Community Advisory Boards (CABs) in Lusaka Zambia: perspectives from the research team and CAB members
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12910-015-0031-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alwyn Mwinga, Keymanthri Moodley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Sierra Leone 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 12 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,585,529
of 5,218,786 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#223
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,600
of 177,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,218,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.