↓ Skip to main content

Divergent and convergent evolution after a common-source outbreak of hepatitis C virus

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Experimental Medicine, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Divergent and convergent evolution after a common-source outbreak of hepatitis C virus
Published in
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, June 2005
DOI 10.1084/jem.20050122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart C. Ray, Liam Fanning, Xiao-Hong Wang, Dale M. Netski, Elizabeth Kenny-Walsh, David L. Thomas

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 4 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,414,047
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#1,751
of 10,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,945
of 242,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#27
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.