↓ Skip to main content

Arsenic in the Evolution of Earth and Extraterrestrial Ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Geomicrobiology Journal, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 168)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 Wikipedia page


68 Dimensions

Readers on

106 Mendeley
Arsenic in the Evolution of Earth and Extraterrestrial Ecosystems
Published in
Geomicrobiology Journal, September 2009
DOI 10.1080/01490450903102525

Ronald S. Oremland, Chad W. Saltikov, Felisa Wolfe-Simon, John F. Stolz

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 8%
Canada 3 3%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 91 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 30%
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Master 11 10%
Unspecified 9 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 23%
Environmental Science 13 12%
Unspecified 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Other 20 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2015.
All research outputs
of 10,490,471 outputs
Outputs from Geomicrobiology Journal
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 227,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geomicrobiology Journal
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,490,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 53rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them