You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Body temperature abnormalities in non-neurological critically ill patients: a review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2052-0492-2-14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shigeki Kushimoto, Satoshi Yamanouchi, Tomoyuki Endo, Takeaki Sato, Ryosuke Nomura, Motoo Fujita, Daisuke Kudo, Taku Omura, Noriko Miyagawa, Tetsuya Sato |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Japan | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Other | 13 | 20% |
Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
Engineering | 5 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,371,487
of 25,010,497 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#327
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,954
of 230,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,010,497 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.