↓ Skip to main content

Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
69 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
296 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, May 2018
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pieter Coenen, Maaike A Huysmans, Andreas Holtermann, Niklas Krause, Willem van Mechelen, Leon M Straker, Allard J van der Beek

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests the existence of a physical activity paradox, with beneficial health outcomes associated with leisure time physical activity, but detrimental health outcomes for those engaging in high level occupational physical activity. This is the first quantitative systematic review of evidence regarding the association between occupational physical activity and all-cause mortality. Systematic review with meta-analysis. A literature search was performed in electronic databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane. We screened for peer reviewed articles from prospective studies assessing the association of occupational physical activity with all-cause mortality. A meta-analysis assessed the association of high (compared with low) level occupational physical activity with all-cause mortality, estimating pooled hazard ratios (HR) (with 95% CI). 2490 unique articles were screened and 33 (from 26 studies) were included. Data from 17 studies (with 193 696 participants) were used in a meta-analysis, showing that men with high level occupational physical activity had an 18% increased risk of early mortality compared with those engaging in low level occupational physical activity (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.34). No such association was observed among women, for whom instead a tendency for an inverse association was found (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01). The results of this review indicate detrimental health consequences associated with high level occupational physical activity in men, even when adjusting for relevant factors (such as leisure time physical activity). These findings suggest that research and physical activity guidelines may differentiate between occupational and leisure time physical activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 296 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 216 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Other 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 68 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 21%
Sports and Recreations 26 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 83 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 784. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#24,883
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#83
of 6,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#518
of 341,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#4
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.