↓ Skip to main content

Likely Health Outcomes for Untreated Acute Febrile Illness in the Tropics in Decision and Economic Models; A Delphi Survey

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Likely Health Outcomes for Untreated Acute Febrile Illness in the Tropics in Decision and Economic Models; A Delphi Survey
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017439
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoel Lubell, Sarah G. Staedke, Brian M. Greenwood, Moses R. Kamya, Malcolm Molyneux, Paul N. Newton, Hugh Reyburn, Robert W. Snow, Umberto D'Alessandro, Mike English, Nick Day, Peter Kremsner, Arjen Dondorp, Wilfred Mbacham, Grant Dorsey, Seth Owusu-Agyei, Kathryn Maitland, Sanjeev Krishna, Charles Newton, Geoffrey Pasvol, Terrie Taylor, Lorenz von Seidlein, Nicholas J. White, Fred Binka, Anne Mills, Christopher J. M. Whitty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Cambodia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 108 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Professor 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 30 26%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 16%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 14 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,234,516
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#58,967
of 164,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,942
of 242,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,146
of 6,300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.