↓ Skip to main content

Soft Drink and Juice Consumption and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: The Singapore Chinese Health Study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
5 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Soft Drink and Juice Consumption and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: The Singapore Chinese Health Study
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2010
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0862
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noel T. Mueller, Andrew Odegaard, Kristin Anderson, Jian-Min Yuan, Myron Gross, Woon-Puay Koh, Mark A. Pereira

Abstract

Sugar-sweetened carbonated beverages (called soft drinks) and juices, which have a high glycemic load relative to other foods and beverages, have been hypothesized as pancreatic cancer risk factors. However, data thus far are scarce, especially from non-European descent populations. We investigated whether higher consumption of soft drinks and juice increases the risk of pancreatic cancer in Chinese men and women.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Saudi Arabia 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Other 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 15 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#374,850
of 21,396,316 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#153
of 4,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,527
of 131,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,396,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.