You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Soft Drink and Juice Consumption and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: The Singapore Chinese Health Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2010
|
DOI | 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0862 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Noel T. Mueller, Andrew Odegaard, Kristin Anderson, Jian-Min Yuan, Myron Gross, Woon-Puay Koh, Mark A. Pereira |
Abstract |
Sugar-sweetened carbonated beverages (called soft drinks) and juices, which have a high glycemic load relative to other foods and beverages, have been hypothesized as pancreatic cancer risk factors. However, data thus far are scarce, especially from non-European descent populations. We investigated whether higher consumption of soft drinks and juice increases the risk of pancreatic cancer in Chinese men and women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 3 | 21% |
Spain | 2 | 14% |
United States | 2 | 14% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
South Africa | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 96 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
Researcher | 15 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
Other | 22 | 22% |
Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 10% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#422,397
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#157
of 4,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,463
of 172,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.