↓ Skip to main content

Engaging the wisdom of crowds and public judgement for land use planning using public participation geographic information systems

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Planner
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Engaging the wisdom of crowds and public judgement for land use planning using public participation geographic information systems
Published in
Australian Planner
DOI 10.1080/07293682.2015.1034147
Authors

Greg Brown

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Student > Master 8 22%
Unspecified 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 33%
Unspecified 9 25%
Social Sciences 6 17%
Computer Science 3 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Other 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,532,430
of 12,052,210 outputs
Outputs from Australian Planner
#146
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,483
of 232,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Planner
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,052,210 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.