↓ Skip to main content

Engaging the wisdom of crowds and public judgement for land use planning using public participation geographic information systems

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Planner
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Engaging the wisdom of crowds and public judgement for land use planning using public participation geographic information systems
Published in
Australian Planner
DOI 10.1080/07293682.2015.1034147
Authors

Greg Brown

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Student > Master 8 21%
Unspecified 6 16%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 32%
Unspecified 10 26%
Social Sciences 7 18%
Computer Science 3 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Other 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,042,644
of 13,016,762 outputs
Outputs from Australian Planner
#172
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,405
of 233,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Planner
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,016,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.