↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of strategies to change organisational culture to improve healthcare performance

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of strategies to change organisational culture to improve healthcare performance
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008315.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Parmelli, Gerd Flodgren, Mary Ellen Schaafsma, Nick Baillie, Fiona R Beyer, Martin P Eccles

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 20%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 10%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 38 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,893,216
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,258
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,640
of 194,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.