You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transition to chronic pain: opportunities for novel therapeutics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41583-018-0012-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theodore J. Price, Allan I. Basbaum, Jacqueline Bresnahan, Jan F. Chambers, Yves De Koninck, Robert R. Edwards, Ru-Rong Ji, Joel Katz, Annemieke Kavelaars, Jon D. Levine, Linda Porter, Neil Schechter, Kathleen A. Sluka, Gregory W. Terman, Tor D. Wager, Tony L. Yaksh, Robert H. Dworkin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
| Canada | 5 | 10% |
| Australia | 4 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 77% |
| Scientists | 9 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 190 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 52 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,021,321
of 25,332,933 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#488
of 2,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,222
of 334,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#10
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,332,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.