The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Research Regarding Debriefing as Part of the Learning Process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Simulation in Healthcare, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1097/sih.0b013e31822724d0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Raemer, Mindi Anderson, Adam Cheng, Ruth Fanning, Vinay Nadkarni, Georges Savoldelli |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 13% |
| Researcher | 26 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 56 | 24% |
| Unknown | 39 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 8% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,547,577
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Simulation in Healthcare
#111
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,076
of 132,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Simulation in Healthcare
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.