↓ Skip to main content

GSLIB-style programs for discriminant analysis and regionalized classification

Overview of attention for article published in Computers & Geosciences, August 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GSLIB-style programs for discriminant analysis and regionalized classification
Published in
Computers & Geosciences, August 1997
DOI 10.1016/s0098-3004(97)00050-2
Authors

Geoffrey C. Bohling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 25%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Computers & Geosciences
#286
of 970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,263
of 28,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computers & Geosciences
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.