↓ Skip to main content

Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes: a systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 315)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes: a systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13750-015-0039-2
Authors

Craig Leisher, Gheda Temsah, Francesca Booker, Michael Day, Bina Agarwal, Elizabeth Matthews, Dilys Roe, Diane Russell, Leah Samberg, Terry Sunderland, David Wilkie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 30%
Social Sciences 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Computer Science 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,348,207
of 24,205,409 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#46
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,085
of 268,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,205,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.