You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Machine Learning-Based Methods for Prediction of Linear B-Cell Epitopes
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
Immunoinformatics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1115-8_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1114-1, 978-1-4939-1115-8
|
| Authors |
Hsin-Wei Wang, Tun-Wen Pai, Wang, Hsin-Wei, Pai, Tun-Wen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 22% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,611,191
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,982
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,960
of 306,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#291
of 589 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 589 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.