↓ Skip to main content

Prophylactic Mesh for the Prevention of Parastomal Hernias: Need for a Deep Dive

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Prophylactic Mesh for the Prevention of Parastomal Hernias: Need for a Deep Dive
Published in
Annals of Surgery, August 2018
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000002805
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fahima Dossa, Nancy N. Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Researcher 2 33%
Other 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,230,064
of 17,780,770 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#1,633
of 7,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,564
of 287,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#53
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,780,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.