You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A practical Java tool for small-molecule compound appraisal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cheminformatics, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13321-015-0079-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Parisa Amani, Todd Sneyd, Sarah Preston, Neil D Young, Lyndel Mason, Ulla-Maja Bailey, Jonathan Baell, David Camp, Robin B Gasser, Alain-Dominique Gorse, Paul Taylor, Andreas Hofmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 11 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,421,220
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#575
of 985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,474
of 267,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.