↓ Skip to main content

Improved N-terminal Processing of Recombinant Proteins Synthesized in Escherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology, May 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved N-terminal Processing of Recombinant Proteins Synthesized in Escherichia coli
Published in
Biotechnology, May 1995
DOI 10.1038/nbt0595-504
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen Sandman, Rowan A. Grayling, John N. Reeve

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 19%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 31%
Chemistry 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 1998.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology
#280
of 494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,444
of 23,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.