↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Corrigendum: Genome-wide characterization of the routes to pluripotency

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 news outlet
7 tweeters


1 Dimensions

Readers on

9 Mendeley
Erratum: Corrigendum: Genome-wide characterization of the routes to pluripotency
Published in
Nature, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/nature14606
Pubmed ID

Samer M. I. Hussein, Mira C. Puri, Peter D. Tonge, Marco Benevento, Andrew J. Corso, Jennifer L. Clancy, Rowland Mosbergen, Mira Li, Dong-Sung Lee, Nicole Cloonan, David L. A. Wood, Javier Munoz, Robert Middleton, Othmar Korn, Hardip R. Patel, Carl A. White, Jong-Yeon Shin, Maely E. Gauthier, Kim-Anh Lê Cao, Jong-Il Kim, Jessica C. Mar, Nika Shakiba, William Ritchie, John E. J. Rasko, Sean M. Grimmond, Peter W. Zandstra, Christine A. Wells, Thomas Preiss, Jeong-Sun Seo, Albert J. R. Heck, Ian M. Rogers, Andras Nagy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 33%
Computer Science 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2015.
All research outputs
of 12,346,102 outputs
Outputs from Nature
of 64,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 241,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
of 985 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,346,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 71.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 985 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.