You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of spontaneous effort during mechanical ventilation: normal lung versus injured lung
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-015-0083-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takeshi Yoshida, Akinori Uchiyama, Yuji Fujino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2015.
All research outputs
#5,453,151
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#253
of 587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,029
of 278,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.