You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archival Science, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10502-015-9247-3 |
| Authors |
Alexandrina Buchanan, Michelle Bastian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 26 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2015.
All research outputs
#5,469,848
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Archival Science
#6
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,241
of 280,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archival Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.