You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of CD8+ T cells during allograft rejection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-879x2002001100001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V. Bueno, J.O.M. Pestana |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#152
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,493
of 90,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.