↓ Skip to main content

Blood Groups in Infection and Host Susceptibility

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Microbiology Reviews, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 980)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
168 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blood Groups in Infection and Host Susceptibility
Published in
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, June 2015
DOI 10.1128/cmr.00109-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Cooling

Abstract

Blood group antigens represent polymorphic traits inherited among individuals and populations. At present, there are 34 recognized human blood groups and hundreds of individual blood group antigens and alleles. Differences in blood group antigen expression can increase or decrease host susceptibility to many infections. Blood groups can play a direct role in infection by serving as receptors and/or coreceptors for microorganisms, parasites, and viruses. In addition, many blood group antigens facilitate intracellular uptake, signal transduction, or adhesion through the organization of membrane microdomains. Several blood groups can modify the innate immune response to infection. Several distinct phenotypes associated with increased host resistance to malaria are overrepresented in populations living in areas where malaria is endemic, as a result of evolutionary pressures. Microorganisms can also stimulate antibodies against blood group antigens, including ABO, T, and Kell. Finally, there is a symbiotic relationship between blood group expression and maturation of the gastrointestinal microbiome.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 168 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 277 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 16%
Student > Master 42 15%
Researcher 41 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Professor 17 6%
Other 59 21%
Unknown 37 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 30 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 57 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 190. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2020.
All research outputs
#94,833
of 15,657,990 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#18
of 980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,507
of 233,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,657,990 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.