↓ Skip to main content

Patient-derived hepatitis C virus inhibits CD4+ but not CD8+ T lymphocyte proliferation in primary T cells

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient-derived hepatitis C virus inhibits CD4+ but not CD8+ T lymphocyte proliferation in primary T cells
Published in
Virology Journal, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12985-015-0322-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonya A. MacParland, Annie Y. Chen, Christopher P. Corkum, Tram N.Q. Pham, Tomasz I. Michalak

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) can replicate in cells of the immune system and productively propagate in primary T lymphocytes in vitro. We aimed to determine whether exposure to authentic, patient-derived HCV can modify the proliferation capacity, susceptibility to apoptosis and phenotype of T cells. Primary total T cells from a healthy donor were used as targets and plasma-derived HCV from patients with chronic hepatitis C served as inocula. T cell phenotype was determined prior to and at different time points after exposure to HCV. T cell proliferation and apoptosis were measured by flow cytometry-based assays. The HCV inocula that induced the highest intracellular expression of HCV also caused a greatest shift in the T cell phenotype from predominantly CD4-positive to CD8-positive. This shift was associated with inhibition of CD4+ but not CD8+ T cell proliferation and did not coincide with altered apoptotic death of either cell subset. The data obtained imply that exposure to native HCV can have an impact on the relative frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by selectively suppressing CD4(+) T lymphocyte proliferation and this may occur in both the presence and the absence of measurable HCV replication in these cells. If the virus exerts a similar effect in vivo, it may contribute to the impairment of virus-specific T cell response by altering cooperation between immune cell subsets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 5 31%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Mathematics 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,656,207
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,617
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,246
of 266,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#24
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.