↓ Skip to main content

The effect of pH adjustment of 1% lidocaine on the onset of sensory and motor blockade of epidural anesthesia in nonpregnant gynecological patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, September 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of pH adjustment of 1% lidocaine on the onset of sensory and motor blockade of epidural anesthesia in nonpregnant gynecological patients
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, September 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02514653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taeko Fukuda, Hiroshi Naito

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,803,483
of 10,423,221 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#55
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,468
of 99,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,423,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 53rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them