@EvolutiaR Iată și un articol relevant. https://t.co/klB8diPZng
Hier werden Wirbeltierarten, die als ausgestorben registriert sind, dargestellt. A zeigt eine hoch konservative Schätzung und B eine konservative Schätzung (man beachte die y-Achse). Hier der Link zur Studie: https://t.co/hMXtYjpm3x https://t.co/GbNSIMszo2
@PhilLovesGames @BonjwaMaurice Also ich kenne sie aus dem Studium. Hier ein Artikel von Yale und eine Studie von Science wo das Ganze ein wenig aufgeschlüsselt wird. Die 140 sind Hochrechnungen. Der erwähnte Vortrag von Dr. Mark Benecke ist sehr sehenswe
Fuente: https://t.co/QmaXQwxdv5
@spenderallegra And we need a biodiversity target. Stop killing 100yrold trees & habitats. Especially in our National Parks which are supposed to be specifically for protection of flora & fauna. And especially when the motivation is to give humans
A sensible comment on the need to think beyond power generation in the climate crisis. As well as reducing CO2 we must also urgently reduce waste, AND protect every remaining plant and animal population. It IS caused by humans + it’s very dumb of us. http
What does “empirically derived” mean? What does “empirically derived” mean?. https://t.co/ccx1AYL691 Questions for https://t.co/c4qnidrdL2 #paydomyhomework
RT @EarthSystemRes: 人属各种的平均物种寿命只有几十万年,我们这个种已经20多万年了,现在生活在一个很脆弱的环境里,全世界的个体都紧密联系在一起,很难说将来还有多少时间 https://t.co/5JLh8ptlcE
人属各种的平均物种寿命只有几十万年,我们这个种已经20多万年了,现在生活在一个很脆弱的环境里,全世界的个体都紧密联系在一起,很难说将来还有多少时间 https://t.co/5JLh8ptlcE
@ani_aval @donswriting @AlexEpstein Apologies, it's hard to track all the responses you're ignoring. Do you mean this thread, where you claimed it is true ("by definition") that the "historical trend" is that only 9 animals and birds have gone extinct? h
@ani_aval @donswriting @AlexEpstein This sounds spectacularly out of sync with findings in biology. Even with conservative assumptions, "the average rate of vertebrate species loss over the last century is up to 100 times higher than the background rate” h
6/ Scintist von @ScientistRebel1 glued to #Bayer building in Berlin. Paper: Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction https://t.co/MgRho1FZ8k #BiodiversityDay #biodiversity #massExtinction #ExtinctionRebellion http
What does “empirically derived” mean? What does “empirically derived” mean?. https://t.co/ccx1AYL691 Questions for https://t.co/m2QErnwjlW #paydomyhomework
RT @CARTAUCSD: Gerardo Ceballos lays out the #SixthMassExtinctionEvent in the high-impact article, "Accelerated modern human–induced specie…
Gerardo Ceballos lays out the #SixthMassExtinctionEvent in the high-impact article, "Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction," in @ScienceAdvances. #ClimateActionNow #biodiversity #CARTA2022PlanetAlteringApes htt
2B62 Die Wirbeltier-Arten sterben aus. Die Rate ist 100 mal höher. Die 2B62-Wirbeltier-Aussterbe-Rate ist um den Faktor 100 überschritten. https://t.co/vSaLHqk9Md liegt der Artenverlust allein unter den Wirbeltieren heute 100 Mal höher https
#EarthDay2022, aside from thinking about how hard #speciation is, I'm carried away by #extinction, which is happening at a rate that is ~100 times higher than the earth's background extinction rate. https://t.co/3l9nUPG9f7 https://t.co/RLwiAVmvqO
2B6 Die Wirbeltier-Arten sterben aus. Die Rate ist 100 mal höher. Die 2B6-Wirbeltier-Aussterbe-Rate ist um den Faktor 100 überschritten. https://t.co/vSaLHqk9Md https://t.co/Xh5iX3uOMl
15/ Wissenschaftler*innen haben DOIs auf ihren Papers. Diese ist auf dem angeklebten: https://t.co/MgRho1XzZS
@girlsinscience_ @ArcadiaScience I think about that. We are possibly in the midst of a mass extinction era https://t.co/8F3jvXhMX8
RT @orientis312: 第6の大量絶滅に突入した人類:生物多様性の劇的な衰退とそれに伴う生態系サービスの喪失を回避することは、保全活動を強化することでまだ可能であるが、その機会は急速に失われつつある(Ceballos et al.)。 https://t.co/mcd…
RT @orientis312: 第6の大量絶滅に突入した人類:生物多様性の劇的な衰退とそれに伴う生態系サービスの喪失を回避することは、保全活動を強化することでまだ可能であるが、その機会は急速に失われつつある(Ceballos et al.)。 https://t.co/mcd…
第6の大量絶滅に突入した人類:生物多様性の劇的な衰退とそれに伴う生態系サービスの喪失を回避することは、保全活動を強化することでまだ可能であるが、その機会は急速に失われつつある(Ceballos et al.)。 https://t.co/mcdjnsXiku https://t.co/F06AiPyg4Z
@StormSignalSA @Jeffrey75327765 @JohnDublin10 @JKSteinberger @GeraldKutney @elsworthroy @DougBebb @MichaelEMann @Kenneth72712993 @Murdochcrazy @cooling_earth @25_cycle A study showing that habitat loss and overexploitation for economic gain are at least as
@Artist_is_in I judge content using logic. Someone's opinion isn't fact, it's opinion. A group's researched sourced and reviewed article is a statement of fact. Opinion =/= Fact. Extinction: https://t.co/clpjsYAIdl Dude, just learn to use Google Scholar
@Hallucigenia4 @ethalises Les incertitudes d'estimation sur le nombre d'espèces et leur déclin estimé sont quantifiées et même en étant très optimiste, l’effondrement de la biodiversité est plus qu'avéré: https://t.co/lHMYJsB09U
Scientists from 🌿@ThisisMyEarth such as @GerardoCeballos have widely warned about #biodiversityloss: https://t.co/2kp8gnWKM8 "Even in species not currently threatened, extirpation of populations is widespread, with losses that far outstrip species-level
@Shoq It’s not a position. I’m stating a fact. I have a whole a degree in economics and sustainability. Capitalism has been over extracting for so long that it is driving the sixth mass extinction. https://t.co/mnecJOLWX1
@Redjont @GeraldKutney You can't reduce loss in biodiversity to climate change! The question that has to be answered is whether the wildlife can be helped by a reduction of CO2 or other meaningful species protection measures. CO2 might be the wrong focus.
@The_BigQ @WellingtonUni Ceballos et al. (2015) compare vertebrate extinction rates with the background (mammalian) extinction rate of 2 E/MSY. The comparison is unrelated to any level 'prior to the evolution of modern humans'. https://t.co/DeKUdGBfXo http
@crentsch @JohnSmi10870416 This puts into perspective current extinction rates vs non anthro background extinction rates: https://t.co/AnGKWqfU1A https://t.co/bR9pyEMBel
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @peterboghossian @ShellenbergerMD Bringing Shellenberger onboard means you've jumped the shark, given his denialism on…
Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction https://t.co/ANrS9mikpK #massextinction #COP26
@peterboghossian @ShellenbergerMD Bringing Shellenberger onboard means you've jumped the shark, given his denialism on climate science. Sad to see you fall this far, Boghossian. Ideologically-motivated contrarianism isn't a substitute for expertise or kno
@astral_luiz @fernandoulrich @antifascio20 Nunca desde a extinção K-Pg tantas espécies animais desaparecerão tão rápido quanto agora (e existe uma coisa chamada biosfera que é afetava por isso - e olha só, fazemos parte dela). Mas um pedaço de METAL sobre
@TArmista @bobik314 @jakubwiech @roman_paliwoda Np. tu: https://t.co/4kzdL3gIx2 Jeżeli bazowa ilość to 2 wymarcia przy obserwacji 100 gatunków przez 10000 lat, to możesz możesz sobie z tego wyliczyć jak w porównaniu wygląda wymieranie 15 gatunków przy ob
@latimeralder @Gordon_DHG @andrw100 @morley20620282 There’s extensive research on the topic. I assume you will fail to read the literature, but here’s one paper to give you a starting point. https://t.co/EbiX5WPwYd
6/ There is well-documented evidence about human-induced biodiversity loss over this same period: https://t.co/74OU3VWs8C https://t.co/jtPV7HSroK
@N3S73 @deer_america @MattWalshBlog I’d recommend taking a basic evolutionary bio course to understand what “fitness” actually means, and humans are causing an accelerating rate of extinctions that rivals the biggest extinction periods from cataclysmic eve
@DerpFighter @algebra_abc @MattWalshBlog Natural “background” levels of extinctions for vertebrates, for example, is estimated to be around 100 species per 100 years; we’re currently causing extinctions up to 100x that rate https://t.co/YoaNSlFjIA
RT @silva_her: Todos somos parte del problema Acá las curvas de pérdida de biodiversidad que hemos generado, por la tala de bosques, la des…
RT @silva_her: Todos somos parte del problema Acá las curvas de pérdida de biodiversidad que hemos generado, por la tala de bosques, la des…
Todos somos parte del problema Acá las curvas de pérdida de biodiversidad que hemos generado, por la tala de bosques, la destrucción de ecosistemas, los pesticidas, especies introducidas. Cuando nos acerquemos al 70% (2030), nos iremos con ellos https://t.
@Kenshiro73 @mettlemomma @nytimes Missing the point, of course. Are you going to pretend humans arent an invasive species? https://t.co/pjX1k1RnYY
@Eviljohna @mettlemomma @nytimes "You are a ridiculous and unserious person." Yes, you are. Crushing bugs because they are "invasive." Look in the mirror. https://t.co/pjX1k1RnYY
RT @berilsirmacek: Life would take many millions of years to recover and our speceis would likely disappear early on. ~Ceballos G. 2015 h…
But our findings are based on natural changes in ocean temperature in the past. At the rate of current human-driven warming, the unfolding #BiodiversityCrisis —hailed as the sixth mass extinction—is likely to play out differently from previous mass... http
RT @VctorManueFdez: 📌 Sexta generación de #incendios y, ¿sexta extinción masiva? 👇👇 #CalentamientoGlobal https://t.co/IzxQbCBpdG
📌 Sexta generación de #incendios y, ¿sexta extinción masiva? 👇👇 #CalentamientoGlobal https://t.co/IzxQbCBpdG
Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction https://t.co/l62glXqZZy
Maybe I'm pessimistic, but isn't reducing the extinction rate tenfold a little unambitious? Ceballos et al. in 2015 had the extinction rate 100x higher than background rates; so we're aiming for 10x the background rate...by 2050? https://t.co/KMxPAKuvn2
RT @Adarchism: まさにその通りで、レッドリストを解析して大量絶滅が起きていることを示した先行研究を無視して3つだけ有名な動物を取り上げて動物保護が奏功しているように見せかけたりと、まぁひどいもんだ。 https://t.co/GPGONS11uU
RT @Adarchism: まさにその通りで、レッドリストを解析して大量絶滅が起きていることを示した先行研究を無視して3つだけ有名な動物を取り上げて動物保護が奏功しているように見せかけたりと、まぁひどいもんだ。 https://t.co/GPGONS11uU
RT @Adarchism: まさにその通りで、レッドリストを解析して大量絶滅が起きていることを示した先行研究を無視して3つだけ有名な動物を取り上げて動物保護が奏功しているように見せかけたりと、まぁひどいもんだ。 https://t.co/GPGONS11uU
RT @Adarchism: まさにその通りで、レッドリストを解析して大量絶滅が起きていることを示した先行研究を無視して3つだけ有名な動物を取り上げて動物保護が奏功しているように見せかけたりと、まぁひどいもんだ。 https://t.co/GPGONS11uU
RT @Adarchism: まさにその通りで、レッドリストを解析して大量絶滅が起きていることを示した先行研究を無視して3つだけ有名な動物を取り上げて動物保護が奏功しているように見せかけたりと、まぁひどいもんだ。 https://t.co/GPGONS11uU
RT @Adarchism: まさにその通りで、レッドリストを解析して大量絶滅が起きていることを示した先行研究を無視して3つだけ有名な動物を取り上げて動物保護が奏功しているように見せかけたりと、まぁひどいもんだ。 https://t.co/GPGONS11uU
RT @Adarchism: まさにその通りで、レッドリストを解析して大量絶滅が起きていることを示した先行研究を無視して3つだけ有名な動物を取り上げて動物保護が奏功しているように見せかけたりと、まぁひどいもんだ。 https://t.co/GPGONS11uU
RT @Adarchism: まさにその通りで、レッドリストを解析して大量絶滅が起きていることを示した先行研究を無視して3つだけ有名な動物を取り上げて動物保護が奏功しているように見せかけたりと、まぁひどいもんだ。 https://t.co/GPGONS11uU
RT @Adarchism: まさにその通りで、レッドリストを解析して大量絶滅が起きていることを示した先行研究を無視して3つだけ有名な動物を取り上げて動物保護が奏功しているように見せかけたりと、まぁひどいもんだ。 https://t.co/GPGONS11uU
まさにその通りで、レッドリストを解析して大量絶滅が起きていることを示した先行研究を無視して3つだけ有名な動物を取り上げて動物保護が奏功しているように見せかけたりと、まぁひどいもんだ。 https://t.co/GPGONS11uU
@Syrfid @socialdemonerna Ja, jag orkar inte faktagranska den artikeln. Hade väl varit på sin plats med några källor. Något som denna de lutar sig mot kanske https://t.co/ikEVO3qgTw
Se estima que ya nos encontramos en la Sexta Gran Extinción Masiva (sí, han habido otras sin presencia del ser humano), pero esta parece estarse produciendo a un ritmo especialmente acelerado ⬇️ https://t.co/iheyX8RnJI
This means that, if there were one million species, one species (at most) would become extinct each year as a normal part of the evolutionary process. But I follow Ceballos et al. (2015) and use the higher mammalian background rate in my analyses. https:/
Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction https://t.co/DH4wH7QbOm
Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction https://t.co/6hinLecFGM
RT @klimaliste_nds: Dr. Mark Benecke vergangene Woche in einem Online-Vortrag bei @RadikalKlima: "Das erste große Sterben, was wir als Biol…
RT @klimaliste_nds: Dr. Mark Benecke vergangene Woche in einem Online-Vortrag bei @RadikalKlima: "Das erste große Sterben, was wir als Biol…
RT @klimaliste_nds: Dr. Mark Benecke vergangene Woche in einem Online-Vortrag bei @RadikalKlima: "Das erste große Sterben, was wir als Biol…
RT @klimaliste_nds: Dr. Mark Benecke vergangene Woche in einem Online-Vortrag bei @RadikalKlima: "Das erste große Sterben, was wir als Biol…
RT @klimaliste_nds: Dr. Mark Benecke vergangene Woche in einem Online-Vortrag bei @RadikalKlima: "Das erste große Sterben, was wir als Biol…
RT @klimaliste_nds: Dr. Mark Benecke vergangene Woche in einem Online-Vortrag bei @RadikalKlima: "Das erste große Sterben, was wir als Biol…
2/3 Zitiertes Paper: Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., García, A., Pringle, R. M., & Palmer, T. M. (2015). Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science advances, 1(5), e1400253. https://t.co
Dr. Mark Benecke vergangene Woche in einem Online-Vortrag bei @RadikalKlima: "Das erste große Sterben, was wir als Biologinnen und Biologen übersehen haben, war das Amphibiensterben." Zitiertes Paper von Minute ~42: https://t.co/WMOpGLXfuB 📽️🎞️👇 https:/
RT @ISalutem: Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction: Anthropocene. 💡➡https://t.co/xhfkSuLoqj…
Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction: Anthropocene. 💡➡https://t.co/xhfkSuLoqj https://t.co/YPJ31YkRV8
@RickTheAlien718 @XRebellionUK @HMICFRS what's this if it's not a scientific basis? https://t.co/0kW5dkb2na https://t.co/1p0pbiVie8 https://t.co/89IxZCFKc3
@JBF45053329 @greenpeacefr @Djebbari_JB Extinction de masse DES ESPÈCES 🙄 Déjà en 2015 : https://t.co/uQ4PS5nJf5 2017 : https://t.co/u4tIXQ07ZU À notre petite échelle d'humain en France on peut réaliser que les insectes ont massivement disparu, nos pare
RT @Ad_Filios: @BellaLack Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction (2015) Gerardo Ceballos discu…
@BellaLack Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction (2015) Gerardo Ceballos discusses the decay of biodiversity. @CeballosGerardo @UNAM_MX @IEcologiaUNAM @StanfordWoods https://t.co/nwpnAjPKAP https://t.co/WFHj9ko
RT @xr_cambridge: "We assess, using extremely conservative assumptions, whether a mass extinction is being caused...These estimates reveal…
RT @xr_cambridge: "We assess, using extremely conservative assumptions, whether a mass extinction is being caused...These estimates reveal…
RT @xr_cambridge: "We assess, using extremely conservative assumptions, whether a mass extinction is being caused...These estimates reveal…
RT @xr_cambridge: "We assess, using extremely conservative assumptions, whether a mass extinction is being caused...These estimates reveal…
RT @xr_cambridge: "We assess, using extremely conservative assumptions, whether a mass extinction is being caused...These estimates reveal…
RT @xr_cambridge: "We assess, using extremely conservative assumptions, whether a mass extinction is being caused...These estimates reveal…
RT @xr_cambridge: "We assess, using extremely conservative assumptions, whether a mass extinction is being caused...These estimates reveal…
"We assess, using extremely conservative assumptions, whether a mass extinction is being caused...These estimates reveal an exceptionally rapid loss of biodiversity over the last few centuries, indicating that a 6th mass extinction is already under way." h
@Cedders68 @XRebelDC @ScientistsX nothing potential about it. we're at the beginning https://t.co/KFLLl7gx9h).
RT @ii_sambliss: Humans are definitely beginning to cause a 6th mass extinction. Vertebrates are going extinct at least 100 times faster th…
"...under the 2 E/MSY background rate, 9 vertebrate extinctions would have been expected since 1900; however, under the conservative rate, 468 more vertebrates have gone extinct..." https://t.co/LXFXlCZoqr
@VirginiaGewin @BiodiversityGuy @jamesecology @tonybarnosky There's a more recent paper that has more updated information about vertebrate extinction rates, but I don't think the visuals are as broadly effective as the 2011 paper: https://t.co/nudzAr2LYt
RT @ArnoldSchiller: [a1] Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P.R., Barnosky, Anthony D. et al. 2015. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: En…
RT @MattNoome: @WEschenbach @GretaThunberg Calm down. You had an actual scientist rework a blog post into a publishable article. Well done.…
@WEschenbach @GretaThunberg Calm down. You had an actual scientist rework a blog post into a publishable article. Well done. It still doesn't refute the fact that the extinction rate is many times higher than the background rate. The 6th mass extinction is