↓ Skip to main content

Developing an emergency ultrasound app – a collaborative project between clinicians from different universities

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing an emergency ultrasound app – a collaborative project between clinicians from different universities
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13049-015-0130-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim Thestrup Foss, Yousif Subhi, Rasmus Aagaard, Ebbe Lahn Bessmann, Morten Thingemann Bøtker, Ole Graumann, Christian B. Laursen, Jesper Weile, Tobias Todsen

Abstract

Focused emergency ultrasound is rapidly evolving as a clinical skill for bedside examination by physicians at all levels of education. Ultrasound is highly operator-dependent and relevant training is essential to ensure appropriate use. When supplementing hands-on focused ultrasound courses, e-learning can increase the learning effect. We developed an emergency ultrasound app to enable onsite e-learning for trainees. In this paper, we share our experiences in the development of this app and present the final product.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 13 27%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 56%
Engineering 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,337,950
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#1,016
of 1,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,371
of 264,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.