↓ Skip to main content

Retracted: Does natural variation in diversity affect biotic resistance?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ecology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retracted: Does natural variation in diversity affect biotic resistance?
Published in
Journal of Ecology, July 2015
DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12439
Authors

Susan Harrison, Howard Cornell, James B. Grace

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Argentina 2 3%
Réunion 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 69 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 10 13%
Professor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 57%
Environmental Science 18 23%
Unspecified 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#5,900,482
of 18,812,327 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#1,679
of 2,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,122
of 240,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#17
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,812,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.