↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of a remote quantitative image analysis in the whole slide images

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy of a remote quantitative image analysis in the whole slide images
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-6-s1-s20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janina Słodkowska, Tomasz Markiewicz, Bartłomiej Grala, Wojciech Kozłowski, Wielisław Papierz, Katarzyna Pleskacz, Piotr Murawski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Ireland 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 8 28%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 45%
Computer Science 4 14%
Engineering 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,738,462
of 12,434,464 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#194
of 758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,474
of 234,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#28
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,434,464 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.