↓ Skip to main content

Origin of land plants: Do conjugating green algae hold the key?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
274 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Origin of land plants: Do conjugating green algae hold the key?
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabina Wodniok, Henner Brinkmann, Gernot Glöckner, Andrew J Heidel, Hervé Philippe, Michael Melkonian, Burkhard Becker

Abstract

The terrestrial habitat was colonized by the ancestors of modern land plants about 500 to 470 million years ago. Today it is widely accepted that land plants (embryophytes) evolved from streptophyte algae, also referred to as charophycean algae. The streptophyte algae are a paraphyletic group of green algae, ranging from unicellular flagellates to morphologically complex forms such as the stoneworts (Charales). For a better understanding of the evolution of land plants, it is of prime importance to identify the streptophyte algae that are the sister-group to the embryophytes. The Charales, the Coleochaetales or more recently the Zygnematales have been considered to be the sister group of the embryophytes However, despite many years of phylogenetic studies, this question has not been resolved and remains controversial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 1%
United States 5 1%
Germany 4 1%
Mexico 4 1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 325 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 17%
Student > Master 53 15%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Professor 22 6%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 46 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 199 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 16%
Environmental Science 20 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Computer Science 4 1%
Other 15 4%
Unknown 51 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,303,466
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#305
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,019
of 120,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.