↓ Skip to main content

Direct wavefront sensing for high-resolution in vivo imaging in scattering tissue

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Direct wavefront sensing for high-resolution in vivo imaging in scattering tissue
Published in
Nature Communications, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms8276
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Wang, Wenzhi Sun, Christopher T. Richie, Brandon K. Harvey, Eric Betzig, Na Ji

Abstract

Adaptive optics by direct imaging of the wavefront distortions of a laser-induced guide star has long been used in astronomy, and more recently in microscopy to compensate for aberrations in transparent specimens. Here we extend this approach to tissues that strongly scatter visible light by exploiting the reduced scattering of near-infrared guide stars. The method enables in vivo two-photon morphological and functional imaging down to 700 μm inside the mouse brain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 205 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 30%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 42 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 60 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 22%
Engineering 47 21%
Neuroscience 26 12%
Unspecified 15 7%
Other 25 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,798,597
of 12,918,691 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#15,965
of 22,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,121
of 231,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#133
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,918,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.