↓ Skip to main content

Manganese toxicity to tropical freshwater species in low hardness water

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Manganese toxicity to tropical freshwater species in low hardness water
Published in
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, October 2015
DOI 10.1002/etc.3135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J Harford, Thomas J Mooney, Melanie A Trenfield, Rick A van Dam

Abstract

Elevated Manganese (Mn) is a common contaminant issue for mine water discharges and previous studies have reported that its toxicity is ameliorated by H + , Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions. The toxicity of manganese (Mn) was assessed in a high risk scenario, i.e. the slightly acidic, soft waters of Magela Creek, Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia. Toxicity estimates were derived for six tropical freshwater species (Chlorella sp., Lemna aequinoctialis, Amerianna cumingi, Moinodaphnia macleayi, Hydra viridissima, and Mogurnda mogurnda). Low effect chronic inhibition concentration (IC10) and acute lethal concentration (LC05) values ranged between 140-80000 µg L-1, with three of the species tested (M. macleayi, A. cumingi and H. viridissima) being more sensitive to Mn than all but one species in the international literature (Hyalella azteca). A loss of Mn was observed on the final day for two of the H. viridissima toxicity tests, which may be a result of the complex speciation of Mn and biological oxidation. International data from toxicity tests conducted in natural water with a similar physico-chemistry to Magela Creek water, were combined with this current data to increase the sample size to produce a more reliable Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD). A 99% protection Guideline Value (GV) of 73 (33- 466) µg L-1 was derived, the low value of this GV reflects the higher toxicity of Mn in slightly acidic soft waters. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 19 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Chemistry 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 22 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2015.
All research outputs
#19,962,154
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#4,606
of 5,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,504
of 295,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#62
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.