You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
| Title |
Ten Steps for Setting Up an Online Journal Club
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/chp.21275 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Teresa M. Chan, Brent Thoma, Ryan Radecki, Joel Topf, Henry H. Woo, Lillian S. Kao, Amalia Cochran, Swapnil Hiremath, Michelle Lin |
| Abstract |
Journal clubs have an extensive history that dates back to the time of Sir William Osler. They provide a venue to discuss the latest medical literature among groups of peers and are an innovative method for translating knowledge into practice within individual institutions. With advances in social media, journal clubs are poised to take an evolutionary step by harnessing digital connectivity. Online journal clubs are uniting hundreds of medical practitioners from around the world under the banner of one cause: enhancing knowledge translation of the medical literature without the limitations of geography. This article describes 10 steps for creating online journal clubs based on the experiences of a multidisciplinary team of clinicians and medical educators. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 21 | 30% |
| United States | 17 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 11% |
| Denmark | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 32% |
| Scientists | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 26% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 48% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |