↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Ten Steps for Setting Up an Online Journal Club

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 519)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
66 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Summary Blogs Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten Steps for Setting Up an Online Journal Club
Published in
The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/chp.21275
Pubmed ID
26115115
Authors

Teresa M. Chan, Brent Thoma, Ryan Radecki, Joel Topf, Henry H. Woo, Lillian S. Kao, Amalia Cochran, Swapnil Hiremath, Michelle Lin

Abstract

Journal clubs have an extensive history that dates back to the time of Sir William Osler. They provide a venue to discuss the latest medical literature among groups of peers and are an innovative method for translating knowledge into practice within individual institutions. With advances in social media, journal clubs are poised to take an evolutionary step by harnessing digital connectivity. Online journal clubs are uniting hundreds of medical practitioners from around the world under the banner of one cause: enhancing knowledge translation of the medical literature without the limitations of geography. This article describes 10 steps for creating online journal clubs based on the experiences of a multidisciplinary team of clinicians and medical educators.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 84 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Lecturer 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 30 34%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 15 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2023.
All research outputs
#729,736
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals
#3
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,067
of 356,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.