↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic factors for progression of clinical osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic factors for progression of clinical osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13075-015-0670-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex N. Bastick, Jos Runhaar, Janneke N. Belo, Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra

Abstract

We performed a systematic review of prognostic factors for the progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), defined as increase in pain, decline in physical function or total joint replacement. We searched for available observational studies up to January 2015 in Medline and Embase according to a specified search strategy. Studies that fulfilled our initial inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological quality. Data were extracted and the results were pooled, or if necessary summarized according to a best evidence synthesis. 1,392 articles were identified and 30 articles met the inclusion criteria. 38 determinants were investigated. Pooling was not possible due to large heterogeneity between studies. The best evidence synthesis showed strong evidence that age, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), co morbidity count, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected infrapatellar synovitis, joint effusion and baseline OA severity, both radiographic and clinical, are associated with clinical knee OA progression. There was moderate evidence showing that education level, vitality, pain coping subscale resting, MRI detected medial femorotibial cartilage loss and general bone marrow lesions (BMLs) are associated with clinical knee OA progression. However, evidence for the majority of determinants was limited (including knee range of motion (ROM) or markers) or conflicting (including age, gender and joint line tenderness). Strong evidence was found for multiple prognostic factors for progression of clinical knee OA. A large variety in definitions of clinical knee OA (progression) remains, which makes it impossible to summarize the evidence through meta-analyses. More research on prognostic factors for knee OA is needed using symptom progression as outcome measure. Remarkably, only few studies have been performed using pain progression as an outcome measure. The pathophysiology of radiographic factors and their relation with symptoms should be further explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 190 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 60 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Engineering 11 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 69 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,833,974
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#282
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,798
of 280,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#8
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.