↓ Skip to main content

Implementing collaborative care programs for psychiatric disorders in medical settings: a practical guide

Overview of attention for article published in General Hospital Psychiatry, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing collaborative care programs for psychiatric disorders in medical settings: a practical guide
Published in
General Hospital Psychiatry, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.06.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott R. Beach, Jane Walker, Christopher M. Celano, Carol A. Mastromauro, Michael Sharpe, Jeff C. Huffman

Abstract

Collaborative care is a systematic, team-based approach to the management of depression and other psychiatric disorders in medical settings. Collaborative care has been found to be effective and cost-effective, but there is little information to guide its implementation in clinical care. The objective of this article is to provide a practical guide to the implementation of collaborative care programs in real-world settings. Based on our experience delivering collaborative care programs, we provide (a) specific, stepwise recommendations for the successful implementation of collaborative care in outpatient settings and (b) an examination of the additional benefits and challenges of collaborative care programs that begin during hospitalization. The implementation of collaborative care requires senior buy-in, an effective team, clear treatment components, engaged clinicians, procedures to ensure quality and adequate infrastructure. Beginning these programs with hospitalized patients may offer additional advantages but also requires additional flexibility to adapt to the inpatient setting. A systematic approach to the development and implementation of collaborative care programs may allow clinicians to effectively and efficiently treat psychiatric illness in medical populations in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 21%
Psychology 11 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from General Hospital Psychiatry
#1,116
of 1,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,712
of 278,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Hospital Psychiatry
#19
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.