↓ Skip to main content

Mapping hypersensitivity/allergic diseases in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)‐11: cross‐linking terms and unmet needs

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapping hypersensitivity/allergic diseases in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)‐11: cross‐linking terms and unmet needs
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13601-015-0063-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana Kase Tanno, Moises Calderon, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos, Pascal Demoly, EAACI/WAO Task force of a Global Classification of Hypersensitivity/Allergic diseases

Abstract

With the aim of actively contributing to the ongoing 11(th) International Classification of Diseases (ICD) revision, an international collaboration led by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) has decided to revise the classification of hypersensitivity/allergic diseases and to validate it for ICD-11 by crowdsourcing the allergist community. However, understanding that the construction of a classification was necessary but not sufficient, we developed a mapping strategy in the attempt to better fit it to the ICD-11 linearization structure. The cross-linking terms process has been constructed based on an algorithm in which we prioritized the pre-coordination, followed by the post-coordination when the first step was not possible. If the above strategies failed to identify the entries, the conditions were ruled as "non specific terms", "no code fit properly" or "missing terms". Amongst the 652 terms distributed in 5 main groups of the Hypersensitivity/Allergic Diseases classification, 169 terms fit directly the codes listed in the ICD-11 beta draft (October 2014 version), 26 were considered as "nonspecific term", 21 were linked to the Foundation by Index, 7 were recorded as inclusions and 2 were cited just in the definition of the condition. The post-coordination was possible for 97 terms, mainly for drug hypersensitivity conditions. We noticed a considerable number of allergen references missing. The proposed strategy of cross-linking terms and the results of this process can actively contribute to updating the hypersensitivity and allergic conditions classification in the ICD-11 beta revision and underlines the need for either a new chapter in ICD-11 possibly entitled Hypersensitivity / Allergic Disorders or at the very least the aggregation of all such diseases under the "Diseases of Immune System" chapter in order for the overlaps to be double parented to the appropriate 'system' chapters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Other 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 37%
Computer Science 3 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,443,738
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#348
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,229
of 281,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.