↓ Skip to main content

Self-help and guided self-help interventions for schizophrenia and related disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-help and guided self-help interventions for schizophrenia and related disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011698
Authors

Farooq Naeem, Shuo Xiang, Tariq A Munshi, David Kingdon, Saeed Farooq

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,183,282
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,682
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,656
of 237,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.