↓ Skip to main content

Improving Conservation Outcomes with a New Paradigm for Understanding Species’ Fundamental and Realized Adaptive Capacity

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Conservation Outcomes with a New Paradigm for Understanding Species’ Fundamental and Realized Adaptive Capacity
Published in
Conservation Letters, August 2015
DOI 10.1111/conl.12190
Authors

Erik A Beever, John O'Leary, Claudia Mengelt, Jordan M West, Susan Julius, Nancy Green, Dawn Magness, Laura Petes, Bruce Stein, Adrienne B Nicotra, Jessica J Hellmann, Amanda L Robertson, Michelle D Staudinger, Andrew A Rosenberg, Eleanora Babij, Jean Brennan, Gregor W Schuurman, Gretchen E Hofmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 291 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 20%
Student > Master 57 19%
Other 19 6%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 37 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 37%
Environmental Science 85 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 5%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 65 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#997,319
of 20,558,827 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#384
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,041
of 243,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,558,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.