↓ Skip to main content

Improving Conservation Outcomes with a New Paradigm for Understanding Species’ Fundamental and Realized Adaptive Capacity

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Conservation Outcomes with a New Paradigm for Understanding Species’ Fundamental and Realized Adaptive Capacity
Published in
Conservation Letters, August 2015
DOI 10.1111/conl.12190
Authors

Erik A Beever, John O'Leary, Claudia Mengelt, Jordan M West, Susan Julius, Nancy Green, Dawn Magness, Laura Petes, Bruce Stein, Adrienne B Nicotra, Jessica J Hellmann, Amanda L Robertson, Michelle D Staudinger, Andrew A Rosenberg, Eleanora Babij, Jean Brennan, Gregor W Schuurman, Gretchen E Hofmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 214 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 22%
Student > Master 42 19%
Other 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 18 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 41%
Environmental Science 74 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 35 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#923,540
of 15,341,807 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#364
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,075
of 232,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,341,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.