You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Experts’ recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-015-0052-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bruno Levy, Olivier Bastien, Karim Bendjelid, Alain Cariou, Tahar Chouihed, Alain Combes, Alexandre Mebazaa, Bruno Megarbane, Patrick Plaisance, Alexandre Ouattara, Christian Spaulding, Jean-Louis Teboul, Fabrice Vanhuyse, Thierry Boulain, Kaldoun Kuteifan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 4 | 9% |
United States | 4 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
Canada | 3 | 7% |
Malaysia | 3 | 7% |
Italy | 2 | 4% |
Colombia | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
France | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 20% |
Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 2 | <1% |
Czechia | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Mauritius | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 296 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 47 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 11% |
Researcher | 32 | 10% |
Student > Master | 27 | 9% |
Other | 81 | 27% |
Unknown | 47 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 201 | 66% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 1% |
Engineering | 4 | 1% |
Other | 14 | 5% |
Unknown | 57 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#851,401
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#89
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,770
of 279,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.