↓ Skip to main content

Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
628 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
676 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002759.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiung-ju Liu, Nancy K Latham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 676 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 <1%
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 642 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 158 23%
Student > Bachelor 121 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 14%
Researcher 72 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 7%
Other 132 20%
Unknown 57 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 227 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 107 16%
Sports and Recreations 99 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 6%
Psychology 27 4%
Other 71 11%
Unknown 102 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#658,266
of 14,322,164 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,986
of 10,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,149
of 232,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,322,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.