↓ Skip to main content

High-tech or field techs: Radio-telemetry is a cost-effective method for reducing bias in songbird nest searching

Overview of attention for article published in Condor, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-tech or field techs: Radio-telemetry is a cost-effective method for reducing bias in songbird nest searching
Published in
Condor, August 2015
DOI 10.1650/condor-14-124.1
Authors

Sean M. Peterson, Henry M. Streby, Justin A. Lehman, Gunnar R. Kramer, Alex C. Fish, David E. Andersen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Czechia 1 3%
Unknown 29 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 25%
Researcher 6 19%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 53%
Environmental Science 8 25%
Computer Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,384,938
of 11,302,850 outputs
Outputs from Condor
#129
of 827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,310
of 235,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Condor
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,302,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.