You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-tech or field techs: Radio-telemetry is a cost-effective method for reducing bias in songbird nest searching
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ornithological Applications, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1650/condor-14-124.1 |
| Authors |
Sean M. Peterson, Henry M. Streby, Justin A. Lehman, Gunnar R. Kramer, Alex C. Fish, David E. Andersen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 9% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 24% |
| Researcher | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,339,957
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#497
of 2,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,445
of 277,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.