↓ Skip to main content

Antiplatelet agents versus control or anticoagulation for heart failure in sinus rhythm

Overview of attention for article published in this source, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antiplatelet agents versus control or anticoagulation for heart failure in sinus rhythm
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, April 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lip, Gregory YH, Wrigley, Benjamin J, Pisters, Ron

Abstract

Morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure is high, it predisposes to stroke and thromboembolism which in turn contribute to high mortality in heart failure. To determine effect of antiplatelet agents when compared to placebo or anticoagulant therapy on death and/or major thromboembolic events in adults with heart failure who are in sinus rhythm. Systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE). Abstracts from cardiology meetings and reference lists of relevant papers were searched. Authors of studies were contacted for further information. Randomised parallel group placebo or controlled trials comparing antiplatelet therapy with control or anticoagulation in adults with chronic heart failure in sinus rhythm. Treatment for at least 1 month. To assess any adverse effects cohort study & non-randomised controlled studies were assessed. Orally administered antiplatelet agents e.g. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, TICLOPIDINE, CLOPIDOGREL, DIPYRIDAMOLE, ASPIRIN compared with anticoagulant agents e.g. COUMARINS, WARFARIN or placebo. Data were extracted by two reviewers independently. No meta-analyses were performed as no data were available from randomised comparisons. The data extracted included data relating to the complexities of the topic area, such as patient characteristics and concomitant treatments, as well as data relating to study eligibility, quality, and outcomes. Non-randomised studies were used to identify side-effects caused by anticoagulants. One RCT of warfarin, aspirin versus no antithrombotic therapy was found but no definitive data have yet been published. Three retrospective, non-randomised cohort studies from the V-HeFT, SOLVD and SAVE trials examining the role of ACE inhibitors have examined the role of aspirin therapy +/- anticoagulant therapy in patients with heart failure and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The results from these trials were conflicting. At present there is no evidence from long term RCTs to recommend use of aspirin to prevent thromboembolism in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm. A possible interaction with ACE inhibitors may reduce the efficacy of aspirin, although this evidence is from retrospective analyses of trial cohorts. There is also no evidence to indicate superior effects from oral anticoagulation, when compared to aspirin, in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 15%
Computer Science 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 12%