↓ Skip to main content

Reordering contigs of draft genomes using the Mauve Aligner

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
331 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
4 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reordering contigs of draft genomes using the Mauve Aligner
Published in
Bioinformatics, June 2009
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna I. Rissman, Bob Mau, Bryan S. Biehl, Aaron E. Darling, Jeremy D. Glasner, Nicole T. Perna

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 7 2%
Brazil 6 2%
United States 6 2%
Germany 5 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 322 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 95 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 24%
Student > Master 47 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 21 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 214 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 18%
Computer Science 15 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Other 18 5%
Unknown 31 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,990,677
of 12,023,633 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#3,346
of 7,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,316
of 237,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#137
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,023,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.